Why The Death of the Book Can Mean Opportunities for Writers

I haven’t been writing much lately, for two reasons. One is the age-old complaint of the day job, which has a tendency to have the same effect on my brain as a steamroller has on a Victoria sponge (all the component parts are still there, but they’re not going to give rise to, well, anything). The second reason is great television, which is having the same effect on my brain as a Class C narcotic (it’s not preventing me from doing anything, but it’s certainly making me not want to bother trying).

Why The Death of the Book Can Mean Opportunity for Writers

It’s too easy to lapse into passivity these days, consuming content instead of creating it. There was an old name for this kind of portable entertainment which we could dip into whenever we wanted, back in the day: it was called a book. Now we’re getting our stories in visual form, and books are suffering, both through the distraction of writers, and the distraction of readers.

But all is not lost. With every fall of an empire comes great opportunity. Great new TV still depends on exactly the same primary ingredient as that which fuelled books throughout their centuries of mass popularity: a good story, well told. And the new era of television is ushering in a brand new opportunity which didn’t exist before the era of internet TV – niche content for smaller, more focused audiences.

The traditional producers of television might complain about audiences being more fragmented than before, but nothing changes the fact that we’re still consuming content. We’re just consuming it differently.

No longer does a network have to have blockbuster shows that will attract all the advertising. Now, it’s about attracting subscribers to the contents of the entire shelf. Networks and streaming providers need to have a suite of products which together, not alone, make a subscription worth it.

It’s unrecognisable today even in comparison to 5 years ago, when streaming TV began to take hold, and everyone was talking about that one show subscribers signed up to see. After all, without Breaking Bad and House of Cards, who knows whether Netflix would ever have entered the mainstream? We may never have even heard of ‘Netflix and Chill’, let alone Stranger Things, The Good Place and Jessica Jones.

Why The Death of the Book Can Mean Opportunity for Writers

Nowadays each streaming service needs at least 5 so-called must-see shows for people to justify taking out a subscription – and they’re getting them.

But what’s most important is that the TV industry managed to create a whole new world where people were prepared to pay for good content. The modern audience understands that the good stuff costs money, and they seem to be happy enough to pay for it.

So what has this got to do with opportunities for writers?

Well, first it’s got to do with the death of the blockbuster in favour of niche content. We’re now used to audiences being more fragmented. What this means is that there’s more room for innovation and risk-taking when it comes to creativity. There are opportunities today for smaller, more unusual stories which would never have been traditional blockbusters 10 years ago, or would never have been made if they had been destined purely for 1990s network television.

Think of all those shows you loved which got cancelled back in the day, simply because they didn’t hit the impossible targets set by their networks. Firefly and Freaks and Geeks come to mind, to name but two. Not to say that modern TV can’t be just as ruthless, at times, but the point is more that shows which wouldn’t even have got a pilot in 2003 are now getting a 2-season run.

You may have fans in Trinidad who’ll make up the numbers, so you don’t have to rely on an impossible 10 million viewers in the even more fragmented US. You don’t have to copy that other big blockbuster, either. You can do something crazy and combine 2 million fans across several different markets.

So why can’t this happen for books, which are a lot cheaper to produce?

New TV is making enough money to sustain itself because it’s not discounting itself out of business. To put it in financial-speak, it’s using sustainable income streams (long-term subscriptions) to fund its output, and it got these by never leading its customers to believe that the product should be free.

It should be pointed out that TV producers have far less competition – the barriers to entry are huge, despite YouTube, because home-produced drama on a shoestring always looks awful. Cheap TV just can’t compete with multi-million dollar professional content.

But it has to be said too that publishers allowed their products to be destroyed by poor discounting models and the devaluation of high-quality content. Also, they’re not leveraging their own competitive advantage.

For instance, if the big publishers were to invest heavily in exclusive branding to differentiate certain niche genres for hard-core fans, or innovation or technology to do with Choose-Your-Own-Adventure style narratives for thrillers and romances, digital extras, or fan-targeting side projects, no indie publishers or small presses would be able to compete.

And as for those opportunities for writers… well, to get back to television, we need new stories now more than ever before in order to meet that demand for lots and lots of niche content.

But also, just like TV, books should no longer have to be blockbusters. They should just have to be unique enough so there’s something for everyone (i.e. every niche) in the audience.

Also, now that TV has once again proven that people are willing to pay for the good stuff, perhaps it’s time for publishers to change the narrative when it comes to books.

There’s still time to convince their audience that when it comes to highly curated, high quality content, it makes sense to pay for the stuff which you didn’t know you were looking for all of your life, until it came looking for you.

Advertisements

  20 comments for “Why The Death of the Book Can Mean Opportunities for Writers

  1. October 7, 2018 at 8:25 pm

    Reblogged this on anita dawes and jaye marie.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. annerallen
    October 7, 2018 at 10:13 pm

    I love this, Tara! I think they used to call this kind of niche sales “Long Tail” marketing. TV shows that appeal to niche audiences are certainly appearing at an amazing rate. If I watched all the stuff I’m dying to see, I’d never get off the couch. If only Netflix had existed to save Firefly!!

    And the niche thing is working for me, too. I seem to be getting a big audience in India. I sold more books there last month than I did in the UK and Canada combined.

    Liked by 3 people

    • October 7, 2018 at 11:05 pm

      That’s fascinating, Anne – I’d heard some time ago that the biggest English-language book market in the world was in India, but I’d never heard who or what was actually selling there until now! I’m delighted to hear it’s you. Just goes to show – I don’t think the publishers operating in the European markets are thinking about what they could take to India – but shouldn’t it be first on their list?

      May we all be blessed in our niches, anyway, and may those niches find their niche on the sub-continent for many years to come!

      Liked by 2 people

  3. October 8, 2018 at 3:35 am

    Mentioning Firefly and now I’m going to have to find and watch Farscape. But, I know what you mean. I lost my afternoon watching Dr. Who.

    I think big publishers and some medium size ones look at a book only for it’s worth to the TV and movie industry. By doing so, they miss opportunities.

    Liked by 1 person

    • October 8, 2018 at 9:26 pm

      This is what’s so great about the Internet, Stanley. You think you’re a lonely sci-fi fan, and then…. hello friends!!

      I reckon big publishers look at a book only for its worth to the bottom line. I’m a bit of a corporate junkie so this makes complete sense to me and I have no real problem with that, but instead of throwing huge money at copycats and also-rans, I’d love to see them have a bit more faith in the damn good story.

      Like

  4. October 8, 2018 at 9:12 am

    So that’s where I’m going wrong. I haven’t watched TV since 1982. I don’t even know who took over Doctor Who after Tom Baker.

    Liked by 1 person

    • October 8, 2018 at 9:27 pm

      Neither do I, Jane, but I bloody well know who she is now 😉

      Like

      • October 8, 2018 at 9:30 pm

        I do too, but since I don’t have a TV I won’t ever get to see her fight the Daleks.

        Liked by 1 person

        • October 8, 2018 at 9:59 pm

          You have the internet, though, so there’s no escape!!

          Like

          • October 9, 2018 at 7:54 am

            You can’t watch TV on it though, can you? Not unless you sign up to things, can you? I’ve never been interested enough to find out, but I’d always assumed you had to pay for the privilege.

            Liked by 1 person

            • October 9, 2018 at 6:30 pm

              I agree BBC is a bit awkward, but most telly winds up online eventually…

              Like

              • October 9, 2018 at 7:07 pm

                Yet another little function I haven’t been bothered to investigate. I’m so lazy when it comes to technology. We’ve been here a year and I still haven’t unpacked the iron…

                Liked by 1 person

                • October 9, 2018 at 8:50 pm

                  I utterly get the iron thing, but no Dr Who? Melts the old brain just to try and imagine it. I have to watch TV because, like that old thingy about a tree falling in a wood making no sound of no one is there, if I didn’t watch the cricket no one would take any wickets and so many people would be out of business – it’s my humanitarian principles kicking in, at heart. And isn’t it funny how we don’t have to watch something to know about it. You know about the female doctor as i know about someone called Dani on love Island (chose any crap you want), not because I’ve watched it or even got close to it but because it’s smeared all over me by news outlets. Sorry, I seen to have hijacked your conversation. I’ll go and content myself with some content…

                  Liked by 1 person

                  • October 9, 2018 at 9:01 pm

                    There are days when Twitter is awash in Doctor Who stuff now that the US has discovered it/him/her. Never heard of Love Island though. Life’s too short to fill it with crap, Geoff. As for cricket!!!!!!

                    Liked by 2 people

                    • October 9, 2018 at 11:33 pm

                      I agree… save about cricket!

                      Liked by 1 person

                    • October 10, 2018 at 11:40 am

                      And I agree with everything, Geoff and Jane, except for the comment about content. Everyone knows there’s no contentment on the Internet.

                      Liked by 1 person

                    • October 10, 2018 at 2:52 pm

                      No, Geoff, I’m sorry. At least with rounders you see people move from time to time.

                      Liked by 2 people

  5. October 10, 2018 at 12:26 am

    Reblogged this on Where Genres Collide.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: